While other state parks are in danger of closing, Folsom Lake appears safe.

Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger’s proposed elimination of support from the general fund could mean the closing of 220 of California’s state parks.

However, 59 state parks would remain open, including the Folsom State Recreation Area, of which Folsom Lake is part of, due to the parks being self-sustaining. The proposed cuts to the parks system would be implemented in phases.

“We are talking about $143.3 million over two years. A $70 million cut the first year and a $73 million cut the second year,” said Sheryl Watson, information officer for the California State Parks system.

The Folsom State Recreation Area is funded by boating and waterway gas tax funds, one of 10 parks in the system to use these taxes. The state park sees between 1.5 and 2 million visitors per year, with a cash inflow of about $3 million, according to the park’s district office.

“Folsom Lake serves as a wonderful place to connect with nature through hiking, swimming, boating, and barbecues,” said Alyssa Beatty of El Dorado Hills. “I go occasionally, I used to like to study there, and would be devastated to hear any news of impending closure.”

For some, Folsom Lake has become a tradition.

“I have memories of my dad taking me fishing there before he died. I’d be heartbroken if it closed,” said Alexandra Poggione. “I’m glad it’s staying open.”

A preliminary study from California State University, Sacramento, Department of Recreation, Parks and Tourism Administration, headed by David Rolloff, Ph.D, shows that the entire park system is capable of being self-sustaining.

“Visitors to California’s state parks spend an average of $4.32 billion per year in park-related expenditures, based on attendance estimates by state Parks and Recreation of about 74.9 million visitors a year,” the study, taken from fall 2007 to February 2009, concludes. The research indicates that park closures would only save the state $9 million, only three times what Folsom Lake makes alone, but could cost local communities.

An alternative plan that has been proposed could put a fee for each registered vehicle in the state, but allow free day use to all California citizens.

“What a good idea it is,” said Tony Mygot, a resident of El Dorado Hills. “It would keep people employed, the parks open. It’s a win-win situation.”

Some see the alternative vehicle fee as a good compromise.

“I would gladly pay extra to be able to continue to use my favorite summer hangout,” Beatty said.

While the committee passed the alternative to Gov. Schwarzenegger’s proposal, the Governor has stated he is likely to veto it. With either plan in place, the local community can still use Folsom Lake for summer fun.